The Unpretty Truth About the Left's Obsession with Aesthetics

In the bustling world of politics, where the left often finds itself tangled in a web of its own making, the obsession with aesthetics has reached a fever pitch. It's 2023, and the battleground is everywhere—from the halls of Congress to the digital realms of social media. The left's fixation on appearances over substance is not just a passing trend; it's a calculated strategy to distract from their lack of concrete solutions. This obsession is not only unproductive but downright unpretty, as it reveals a shallow approach to governance and policy-making.

First, let's talk about the who. The left is populated by a cadre of politicians, celebrities, and influencers who prioritize style over substance. They are the ones who champion causes based on how they look rather than their actual impact. It's the politicians who spend more time curating their Instagram feeds than crafting legislation that benefits the average American. It's the celebrities who jump on the latest social justice bandwagon without understanding the complexities of the issues they claim to support.

Now, the what. This obsession manifests in various ways, from the superficiality of political campaigns to the hollow virtue signaling on social media. It's the emphasis on identity politics, where the focus is on the color of one's skin or gender rather than the content of their character or the merit of their ideas. It's the prioritization of symbolic gestures over meaningful action, like changing the names of buildings while ignoring the systemic issues that plague our society.

When did this all start? While the left has always had a penchant for style, this current wave of aesthetic obsession can be traced back to the rise of social media in the early 2010s. Platforms like Instagram and Twitter have given rise to a culture where image is everything, and the left has capitalized on this trend to push their agenda. The result is a political landscape where appearances are valued more than achievements, and where the loudest voices are often the least informed.

Where is this happening? Everywhere. From the streets of San Francisco to the corridors of power in Washington, D.C., the left's obsession with aesthetics is pervasive. It's in the classrooms where educators are more concerned with teaching students about pronouns than preparing them for the real world. It's in the media, where journalists prioritize sensationalism over facts, and where the narrative is shaped by what looks good rather than what is true.

Why is this happening? The answer is simple: it's easier to focus on appearances than to tackle the hard issues. It's easier to post a black square on Instagram than to engage in meaningful dialogue about race relations. It's easier to wear a pink hat at a protest than to propose viable solutions to gender inequality. The left's obsession with aesthetics is a convenient way to avoid accountability and responsibility.

This fixation on aesthetics is not just unproductive; it's dangerous. It creates a culture where style is valued over substance, where the loudest voices drown out the most thoughtful ones, and where the focus is on the superficial rather than the significant. It leads to a society where people are judged by their appearance rather than their actions, and where the pursuit of truth is overshadowed by the pursuit of trends.

The left's obsession with aesthetics is a symptom of a larger problem: a lack of vision and leadership. Instead of focusing on what truly matters—like creating jobs, improving education, and ensuring national security—they are distracted by the latest fads and fashions. This is not just unpretty; it's a disservice to the American people who deserve leaders who prioritize substance over style.

In the end, the left's fixation on aesthetics is a losing strategy. It may win them likes and retweets, but it won't win them the hearts and minds of the American people. The sooner they realize that, the better off we'll all be. Until then, we'll continue to watch as they prioritize the unpretty over the important, and as they focus on the superficial rather than the substantial.