The Thomas of Cana Copper Plates: History Liberals Don't Want You to Know

The Thomas of Cana Copper Plates: History Liberals Don't Want You to Know

Thomas of Cana copper plates are ancient relics that expose a rarely acknowledged tale of migration, privilege, and harmonious coexistence long before the modern era. This narrative challenges contemporary discourses on imperialism and multiculturalism.

Vince Vanguard

Vince Vanguard

History can be more thrilling than a good novel, especially when it involves ancient copper plates narrating tales of migrations and privileges granted by a mysterious king. Enter Thomas of Cana and his astonishing copper plates. This narrative entwines the captivating journey of Thomas of Cana, a Syrian merchant who turned up on India's Malabar Coast around the 4th or 5th century AD, with the remarkable copper plates supposedly documenting his astounding reception. Allegedly, this Thomas led a group of refugees, likely from the Middle East, who were escaping persecution, seeking refuge under the benevolent wings of the King of Kerala in India.

These copper plates are not just relics but are like time capsules that reveal an era where Christianity peppered its influence through trade routes rather than ideological warfare. These pieces of bronze-tinted parchment symbolize a harmonious co-existence, a compact between faiths and cultures, driven by necessity and diplomacy. If only modern multiculturalism could learn a lesson or two here: the embrace of different cultures should be natural rather than a forced pileup.

As the story goes, Thomas of Cana was no ordinary figure. This entrepreneur and leader were received by the Chera dynasty, who granted significant privileges to him and his followers. The plates are a laudable testament to the early Christian presence in India, often ignored in today’s politically correct dialogues that prefer to downplay Christian influence in favor of more 'acceptable' narratives. These written edicts are believed to have granted land, tax exemptions, and the freedom to build churches, which underscores the historical significance of Christianity’s rooted influence in the region.

But let’s not pull our punches; there’s controversy here! Some historians even question the authenticity of the story and the plates themselves. Questions arise about their exact date, the inscriptions, and their true authorship. And yet, these plates represent a tangible piece of evidence, drawing from the fabric of history that established thriving Christian communities well before European colonialists planted their flags.

This affair becomes all the more gripping when liberals conveniently gloss over how these communities flourished under local rule, without the need for British or Portuguese intervention. But this doesn't fit their narrative about imperialism, does it? The convivial trade routes fostered communication and exchange of ideas — something they claim to champion. And yet, these copper plates tell of a world where trade and religious diversity thrived together long before modern social justice warriors even felt the need for hashtags.

The exact language on these plates features an intriguing mix of Tamil and old Malayalam, the script-writers likely embedding symbolism and customs into every etching. This highlights a historical relationship of respect and mutual benefit rather than exploitation. In a twist of irony, imagine what these plates endure today if shipped to the Tower of Babel that is our social discourse.

Some academics might argue over whether Thomas actually existed at all, with suspicions of conflated accounts mixing up his tale with that of Thomas the Apostle — another marksmanship target that critics love to aim their skepticism at. Yet isn’t it oddly suspicious how these diverse historical figures apparently setting up harmonious multi-ethnic communities don’t get gold stars from the very people who espouse tolerance?

The significance of these plates goes beyond local Kerala lore. They remind us of the often omitted narrative in global discussions on migration and cultural exchange — that of Christianity's deep-rooted and undeniably positive influence. As Christian communities were establishing homes, sheltering the body and soul, it was merit and resilience, rather than the imposition of power, that allowed them to thrive.

In an age where culture wars try to erase distinctions in favor of a monocultural stew, Thomas's plates offer a different recipe. Here was integration to mutual benefit, driven by choice and necessity rather than coercion or guilt. Whenever you hear the coming wave of chatter about cultural sensitivities, remember these copper plates. Let them be reminders of a past that liberals often neglect — the fact that religious diversity in remote regions has thrived on negotiation and coexistence rather than mere conquest.

So there you have it, a historical account etched in copper, standing testament to the symbiotic dynamics of faith, trade, and governance undertaken centuries ago. Perhaps what the world needs is less silencing of such stories and more engagement with them: narratives where history proves more inventive and nuanced, resisting simplistic modern interpretations. If only the historical Thomas of Cana could chime in and set today's overly sensitive record straight.