Why 'The Irregulars' is a Defective Look at Victorian London

Why 'The Irregulars' is a Defective Look at Victorian London

If you thought the streets of Victorian London were all fog and cobblestones, 'The Irregulars' is here to tell you otherwise—albeit in a rather peculiar way. Dive into a critique of this Netflix series that blends melodrama and historical inaccuracies.

Vince Vanguard

Vince Vanguard

If you thought the streets of Victorian London were all fog and cobblestones, 'The Irregulars' is here to tell you otherwise—albeit in a rather peculiar way. This Netflix series, quite adventurous for an actual tale but bizarrely fanciful, chronicles the lives of a ragtag bunch known as The Irregulars. They’re a band of street-savvy teens who find themselves embroiled in solving supernatural crimes for Dr. Watson while Sherlock Holmes is MIA. Dr. Watson, the famed companion of Sherlock Holmes, recruits these teenagers to tackle cases with otherworldly motives and sinister shadows lurking in every corner. The series takes place in the gritty underbelly of 19th century London, weaving gothic intrigue with supernatural flair. So why does this seemingly innovative series deserve a raised eyebrow? Let’s break it down.

  1. A Misguided Idea of Victorian Values: The show paints Victorian London as some anarchic, mystical playground. Reality check: the British Empire wasn't built of wizarding sprinkles and ghostly apparitions. This era brought forth monumental advancements in industry and society. While 'The Irregulars' throws in some intriguing mysteries, it waves away the sober and calculative spirit of the times. The charm of Victorian London was in its structured societal codes and its resistance to such unfounded chaos.

  2. Teen Drama Masquerading as Historical Fiction: 'The Irregulars' doesn’t shy away from transforming its setting into what feels like a mixture of gothic horror and supernatural mumbo jumbo. However, what viewers get are melodramatic outbursts rather than precise historical depth. Teen drama is woven throughout, but the reality is this goes against the true pioneering intellect and hardship of those days. Supernatural themes meant indulging in spiritualism, not sorcery.

  3. A Diversion from Canonical Characters: Let’s talk about characters. Sherlock Holmes is treated more as a figure lurking in the background rather than the forefront. If you’re here because you’re a Holmesian aficionado craving clever deductions, this series disappoints by not giving Holmes the prominent role he deserves. The tales spun by Arthur Conan Doyle concentrated on human cleverness, not fictional teen whims or the magic hidden in some dark alley.

  4. Historical Revisionism: There's valuing creativity, and then there's misleadingly rewriting the annals of history. Victorian London was known for its innovations and stringent moral codes. A mash-up of mystical forces undermines these foundations, replacing genuine historical conflict with supernatural elements that did not exist. The dominant focus on fantastical elements detaches from the rich seam of real socio-political issues during those times.

  5. Overcompensation and Inclusion: The creators seem to indulge in throwing diverse characters together as some kind of existential solution to deeper societal problems. Instead of echoing the true emotional depth and complexity of Victorian London, what we see is a contemporary politicking agenda where authenticity takes the back seat.

  6. Glamourizing the Gutter: The series decides to romanticize the street life of Victorian youth, painting them as sort of savior figures when most lived in abject poverty with very little agency. The 'cool' status given to these characters leaves a sour taste for those interested in sincere historical representation, portraying them as anomaly-solving heroes rather than as people in circumstances beyond their control.

  7. Lost Opportunities for Historical Drama: Why resort to inventing illusions and demonic threats when Victorian London itself is a labyrinth of real detective puzzles, societal mores, and conflict ripe for storytelling? 'The Irregulars' could’ve had a stronger narrative if it delved into actual case files and disputes, not intangible creatures.

  8. Narrative Deficiencies: Due to the over-saturation of magical elements, the real heroes—the youth making societal changes or early detectives solving crimes—become sidelined by a fictive facade. When real history is sacrificed at the altar of fantasy, it speaks more about modern sensibilities than any genuine appreciation of the past.

  9. Misleading Influences: At times, 'The Irregulars' seems to blur the lines between reality and mere urban fantasy tropes, often throwing a modern lens on historical themes. This undermines not only the spirit of Victorian London but also those viewers who crave narratives rich in believability and authenticity.

  10. Downgrade of Investigative Brilliance: What is a Sherlock Holmes story without the bedrock of logical deduction and the stark realism of human nature? By downplaying Holmes' role and inflating the supernatural elements, this series tumbles into the realm of low-stakes thrills, abandoning the intellectual flair for which these stories are renowned.

'Irregulars' asserts itself as a modern fairy tale rather than an earnest exploration of Victorian times. With rampant historical revisionism and twists on tried-and-true characters, it's an endeavor looking to cater to present emotional biases rather than genuine historical dialogue. Can’t say it paints a picture of consistency in showcasing true historical grit and glamour.