René Charles Edmond His: Why Art Still Matters

René Charles Edmond His: Why Art Still Matters

René Charles Edmond His remains an unsung hero in the art world, painting breathtaking landscapes when art celebrated beauty and depth. With meticulous brushwork, His captured France's natural elegance during the early 20th century, a period that's starkly contrasted with today's often nonsensical art scene.

Vince Vanguard

Vince Vanguard

René Charles Edmond His might not be the first name that springs to mind when considering masterful painters, but he sure should be. What a shame that political correctness and modern art critics might have led you astray from recognizing genuine creativity. His was born in France, a country renowned for its cultural significance, in 1877. He painted landscapes at a time when artistic expression was flourishing, yet unshackled by the post-modern bias that plagues far too many institutions today. If anyone serves as a reminder of what art once stood for—beauty, realism, and depth—it's this unsung master.

Starting his artistic journey during the grandeur of the Belle Époque, His did what many modern artists seem terrified to do: he captured the natural world with fidelity and affection. His precise brushwork and use of color made his depictions of the French countryside not just good paintings, but breath-taking compositions that offered more than a fleeting glance. While today's "art" installations frequently offer nothing more than a fleeting outrage or a navel-gazing complexity that's lost on anyone but the most die-hard modernists, His painted scenes that subtly urged viewers to appreciate the real world. Imagine that.

His art was deeply tied to the French Impressionist movement, which should give him clout alongside the renowned artists of his era. Yet, the likelihood is that some have only overlooked His because they’re too busy promoting a modern art agenda that prizes absurdity over accuracy. Picture how impactful His's art could be if only it were allowed to be appreciated again for its meticulous beauty and clarity. Intriguing isn’t it?

The bulk of His's art was produced in the early 20th century, a period we nostalgically look back on as one of the greatest times for culture and civility, but much of it remains underappreciated today. Why? Because His didn't follow the absurd antics that some contemporary artists do—smearing canvases with paint while pretending that viewers need a Ph.D. in "art speak" to understand it.

His lived in Paris for much of his life until his death in 1960. Paris, the city of love and lights, was home to this unheralded master whose untimely obscurity seems almost criminal in an age where art has shifted from expression and skill to gimmick. His's landscapes celebrated France’s natural beauty, imbued with a romantic realism lost on modern critics too entrenched in fake controversy to appreciate his mastery. This kind of authenticity is what art should be about; strange that it's been all but erased in today's woke art circles.

René Charles Edmond His wasn't just a painter. He was a storyteller whose palette did the talking. His paintings reflected a world steeped in serenity and grace. What a concept! His didn't just show trees and rivers; he delivered a narrative about a simpler world, far removed from today’s keyboard warriors and their endless outrage. In a way, His daringly clung to an ideal of art that transcends time—one of beauty and truth.

It's astounding that someone like His, who should be featured in every history book, is sidelined by a culture that glorifies the shock value of modern art. It's more than nostalgic praise; it's a call for an artistic revolution back to meaningful artwork. His spoke of timeless values through meticulous brush strokes rather than "experiments" that dare viewers to “understand” nonsense. Maybe that’s why he’s not mentioned with the frequency—or the reverence—that lesser works sometimes receive.

Liberals may have their reasons, but this is not a reflection on the core value of art nor how it should be appreciated. Just because societal norms have shifted doesn't mean we have to discard the masters who truly knew how to wield a brush. The art world needs more His-like dedication to technique and inspiration wept in truth and beauty.

This isn't to decry all modern art but rather to point out that figures like René Charles Edmond His have something more to offer—a vision of what real art used to be and what it can be again. As a cultural figure, His’s life reminds us to value durability and magnificence over sensationalism.

Art historians usually lament that names like His get lost among those who never dared much. His, however, dared beautifully and asked nothing from the viewer but to simply appreciate and reflect. Ironically, that's often too much to ask in today's era of high-strung expressions through the anti-art movements that pass for creativity.

His left behind a true portrayal of an era unfamiliar with our current cultural quagmires, and one can only hope that more people get acquainted with his work. Becoming familiar with René Charles Edmond His is not just an acknowledgment of the talent of a bygone age but a conscious effort to re-evaluate what you'll call art in our deceptive time.

So look him up, find his works, and dare to be inspired by someone who valued art as an eternal dialogue of beauty and form. A little less disdain for genuine talent and a bit more appreciation for commonsense realism could do us all some good.