Why Waiting for the Future is a Liberal Fantasy

Why Waiting for the Future is a Liberal Fantasy

Who doesn't love dreaming of a future filled with technology and ease? Yet, in this fast-paced pursuit, we might be ignoring the hard questions that need answering today.

Vince Vanguard

Vince Vanguard

Imagine a world where every impossible dream comes true, where technology and society advance so far they fix every problem humanity has ever faced. Sounds amazing, right? That's what the movement to 'Go to the Future' promises. Who are these futuristic dreamers? Young tech enthusiasts, policy makers hungry for progress, and social activists with stars in their eyes. Their 'promised land' of sleek skyscrapers, flying cars, and world peace is peppered across movies and novels, whispering the siren call of tomorrow's potential.

But let's pump the brakes here. The idea is that by embracing innovation today, especially in technology and environmental policies, we'll shape a utopian society. They tell us it's urgent—time, they insist, is ticking. The idea is thrown around everywhere from Silicon Valley to the steps of Capitol Hill, driven by the ever-churning wheels of a progressive agenda.

First things first, though—stop relying on dreamy depictions of the future. Real life isn't a science fiction novel, and blindly chasing active imaginations can only lead to disappointment and chaos. Sure, things like clean energy, advanced medicine, and AI can enhance life. But let's face it, overblown reliance on futuristic fantasies has the potential to spiral out of control. There won't be any flying cars swooping in to save us if we've spent all our resources on pie-in-the-sky projects.

Second, the economic impact is worth considering. While 'Go to the Future' sounds appealing, it often ignores the significant financial burden or doesn't accurately account for who pays the bill. With taxpayers already stretched under bloated bills, this drive to innovate without boundaries seems like an eager volunteer for the already burdensome debt crisis. Promoting wild futuristic dreams without solid financial planning? It’s like buying a new house while ignoring the leaky roof on the old one.

Moreover, the cry for technological advancement often disregards an undeniable societal truth: Not everyone benefits equally. Who gets to decide which technologies we prioritize? Whose jobs get automated out of existence? And how prepared are we to fix the fallout? It may sound cynical, but focusing on making equitable policies rather than throwing money at the future could help us more in the present.

Culture change, too, seems to be a forced byproduct of this chase. With every step toward this futuristic ideal, traditional values end up under attack, along with community-oriented thinking. Innovation is a tool, not the end. Instead of focusing on the well-being of individuals, there’s a blanket faith in technology’s ability to solve problems made by humans in the first place.

Technology moves faster than public policy can keep up with. Everyone loves innovation—until the consequences arrive. The internet seemed like a miracle until we were barraged with privacy issues. Robotics promised labor efficiency but now face backlash from the labor market. Blindly, or aggressively, rushing to 'Go to the Future' is akin to setting up a live social experiment using us all as guinea pigs.

Even the weather is used to support this 'forward-thinking' agenda. Face it, climate change mitigation is itself a major reason to push for a future forward agenda. Yet these advocates often fail to mention that radical, immediate goals can wreak havoc on industries and people who are less prepared for rapid change.

Now, let’s not ignore that some of these ideas have fascinating potential. But leaving loopholes larger than life, ignoring economic reality, and forcing drastic changes on society's backbone will only damage the essence of progress. Stability—not just advancement for the sake of advancement—must be central to any vision of the future.

Falling for the glimmer of tomorrow without addressing today's challenges will only exacerbate divisions, confuse objectives, and enlarge the gap between expectation and reality. Painting a picture of the future that neglects to address human realities is less a path to a utopia and more road map to dystopia. Why go there if we're not even ready for it? It wouldn’t hurt to focus on what's already in front of us before hurtling blindly into the beyond.