Stickers: The Latest Tool in the Left's Arsenal of Censorship

Stickers: The Latest Tool in the Left's Arsenal of Censorship

Stickers are being used as a tool for censorship by activists aiming to suppress conservative viewpoints in public spaces, highlighting a growing trend of free speech suppression.

Vince Vanguard

Vince Vanguard

Stickers: The Latest Tool in the Left's Arsenal of Censorship

Who would have thought that something as innocuous as a sticker could become a battleground for free speech? In the bustling streets of Portland, Oregon, a new trend has emerged where activists are using stickers to silence opposing viewpoints. This phenomenon began in early 2023 when a group of self-proclaimed "social justice warriors" decided that the best way to combat ideas they disagree with is to plaster over them with stickers. The aim? To erase any trace of conservative thought from public spaces. Why? Because apparently, the mere presence of a differing opinion is too much for their fragile sensibilities to handle.

Stickers have become the new weapon of choice for those who can't handle a good old-fashioned debate. Instead of engaging in meaningful discussions, these activists prefer to slap a sticker over any message they find offensive. It's a lazy, cowardly tactic that screams, "I can't argue with you, so I'll just cover you up." This is the same crowd that preaches tolerance and inclusivity, yet they can't tolerate a single dissenting voice. The irony is palpable.

The sticker craze isn't just limited to Portland. It's spreading like wildfire across college campuses and urban centers nationwide. These stickers often bear slogans like "Hate Speech is Not Free Speech" or "Silence is Violence," which are plastered over posters, flyers, and even public art that doesn't align with their worldview. It's a blatant attempt to control the narrative and suppress any form of expression that doesn't fit their agenda.

This isn't just about stickers; it's about a broader trend of censorship and control. The left has long been accused of trying to stifle free speech, and this is just the latest example. They claim to champion diversity, yet they can't handle a diversity of thought. It's a classic case of "do as I say, not as I do." They want to dictate what can and cannot be said, and they're using stickers as their tool of choice.

The hypocrisy is astounding. These activists claim to fight against oppression, yet they're the ones oppressing others by silencing their voices. They talk about creating safe spaces, but what they really mean is echo chambers where only their opinions are allowed. It's a dangerous precedent that threatens the very foundation of free speech in this country.

Stickers may seem harmless, but they represent a much larger issue. They're a symbol of the left's unwillingness to engage in open dialogue and their desire to control the conversation. It's a slippery slope that leads to a society where only one viewpoint is allowed, and any dissent is swiftly silenced.

It's time to peel back the layers and expose this tactic for what it is: an assault on free speech. We must stand up against this form of censorship and fight for the right to express our opinions, no matter how unpopular they may be. Stickers may be sticky, but our resolve to protect free speech must be even stickier.