Why PS 66 is a Classic Example of Educational Extremism

Why PS 66 is a Classic Example of Educational Extremism

PS 66 in Queens, New York has become a symbol of education gone awry. This post explores why its approach highlights systemic flaws.

Vince Vanguard

Vince Vanguard

Strap in, folks! When we talk about PS 66, we're not discussing just another brick-in-the-wall public school. No, PS 66, located in Queens, New York, epitomizes educational sleight-of-hand that began quite a few decades ago and yet still inches its way forward today—much like a confused tortoise. With its inception in the early 20th century, this school was supposed to be a beacon of academic achievement and civic duty. But what do we get instead? A breeding ground for left-leaning curricula wrapped up in pretty packaging.

Let's break it down. Why is PS 66 significant? It’s because it represents what's wrong with modern education. Here are ten reasons why this school showcases problems that plague our academic system—a system more invested in shaping ideology than teaching hard skills.

First and foremost, the curriculum at PS 66 is packed to the brim with revisionist history. You’ll hear teachers ramble on about 'social justice', yet conveniently zip their mouths about the horrors of communism, socialism, or the achievements of conservative figures in history. The open bias is like a giant neon sign at Times Square.

Second, PS 66 has jumped on the technology bandwagon, but let's call it what it is: a waste of taxpayers' money on expensive gadgets that are more about style than substance. Chromebooks and iPads are handed out like confetti, as if the screens themselves impart wisdom. Our hard-earned cash is funding what's essentially glorified babysitting.

Third, remember when report cards were a measure of merit and not just a participation trophy? Not here! At PS 66, grades are like that warm, fuzzy safety net that's itching to catch every fall—and it shows. Pass-fail systems and reduced emphasis on competition justify mediocrity.

Fourth, the school openly embraces an experimental agenda. Multigenerational classrooms sound like a great idea until you realize they’re already swamped with behavioral issues that make even the most patient teachers scream into their pillows at night. It's yet another example of a poorly implemented 'innovation.'

Fifth, what do you get when you don’t teach fundamental skills? Generations unable to reason independently. Here, math lessons often masquerade as lessons in 'equity' and English classes are dedicated to dismantling 'privilege' instead of honing communication skills. Who needs to learn about Hemingway when you can spend the whole semester dissecting perceived biases in classic literature?

Sixth, and it needs to be said: parent involvement is a charade. Schools like PS 66 give off the air of "open communication" with parents but push back whenever you challenge the accepted doctrine. It's all well and good until you have a parent-teacher meeting where you realize your child's welfare has been replaced by a smirking poster on 'global citizenship.'

Seventh, PS 66 often appears to be a stronghold for social activism thinly veiled under the guise of academic instruction. Earth Day, LGBTQ+ History Month, and Anti-Bullying Awareness take precedence over necessities like math and science fairs. Participation shouldn’t mean kids end up with war paint of ideology instead of solid educational foundations.

Eighth, forget about patriotic practices; gone are the days of morning flag salute rituals. It's alarming to note how quickly we jettison traditions that foster unity and replace them with fractured narratives that feed division. The lack of focus on American heritage or civic pride couldn’t be more apparent if Lady Liberty herself dropped her torch.

Ninth, there's an obsession with 'data'—a word tossed around so frivolously that it might as well be a yo-yo. Administrators love 'data-driven' decisions even if half the teachers can't make sense of it, let alone the students. The whole production is a farce, yet numbers look great on shiny reports, don't they?

Tenth, and perhaps most disheartening, is that stunning lack of vocational training. How do they expect students to be prepared for life outside school walls if there's more focus on 'facilitating dialogue' rather than hands-on skills that encourage self-reliance and employability?

If PS 66 represents what education is evolving into, then it’s clear we're walking a perilous path. Those who buy into this deliberate dissolution of traditional learning pillars have a lot to answer for.