Why "Native New Yorker" is a Masterpiece Liberals Can't Handle

Why "Native New Yorker" is a Masterpiece Liberals Can't Handle

Uncover the provocative brilliance of 'Native New Yorker,' a silent film that challenges modern narratives and celebrates the forgotten history of New York City through the lens of a Native American perspective.

Vince Vanguard

Vince Vanguard

Why "Native New Yorker" is a Masterpiece Liberals Can't Handle

"Native New Yorker" is a short film that packs a punch, and not just because of its artistic brilliance. Directed by Steve Bilich in 2005, this black-and-white silent film captures the essence of New York City through the eyes of a Native American, Terry "Coyote" Murphy. Filmed entirely with a 1924 hand-cranked Cine-Kodak camera, it takes viewers on a journey through the city, from the bustling streets of Manhattan to the serene landscapes of Central Park. The film is a tribute to the resilience and spirit of New York, but it also serves as a reminder of the city's forgotten history and the people who once called it home. It's a cinematic gem that challenges the modern narrative and leaves some folks squirming in their seats.

First off, let's talk about the audacity of using a 1924 camera in the 21st century. In an age where digital technology reigns supreme, Bilich's choice to go old-school is a bold statement. It’s a slap in the face to the tech-obsessed culture that values pixels over authenticity. The grainy, imperfect footage is a breath of fresh air, a reminder that sometimes, less is more. It’s a nod to the past, a time when storytelling was about substance, not special effects. This film is a testament to the power of simplicity, something that’s often lost in today’s overproduced media landscape.

The film’s protagonist, Terry "Coyote" Murphy, is a Native American who walks through the city, observing its people and places. His presence is a stark contrast to the urban environment, a reminder of the land’s original inhabitants. It’s a powerful image that challenges the sanitized version of history that’s often presented. The film doesn’t shy away from the uncomfortable truth that the city was built on the backs of those who were displaced. It’s a narrative that’s often glossed over, but "Native New Yorker" brings it to the forefront, forcing viewers to confront the reality of the past.

The film’s soundtrack, composed by William Susman, is another element that sets it apart. The haunting melodies complement the visuals perfectly, creating an atmosphere that’s both nostalgic and poignant. It’s a reminder that music can be just as powerful as dialogue, if not more so. The absence of spoken words allows the viewer to focus on the imagery and the emotions it evokes. It’s a refreshing change from the constant chatter that fills most films today.

"Native New Yorker" is not just a film; it’s a statement. It’s a reminder that history is not always what it seems, and that the stories we tell are often incomplete. It’s a call to action, urging viewers to look beyond the surface and question the narratives they’ve been fed. It’s a film that challenges the status quo, and that’s precisely why it’s so important.

In a world where political correctness often stifles creativity, "Native New Yorker" is a breath of fresh air. It’s a film that doesn’t shy away from the truth, no matter how uncomfortable it may be. It’s a reminder that art should provoke, challenge, and inspire. It’s a film that dares to be different, and that’s what makes it a masterpiece.

So, if you’re looking for a film that will make you think, "Native New Yorker" is a must-watch. It’s a film that will challenge your perceptions and leave you questioning everything you thought you knew about history, culture, and art. It’s a film that will stay with you long after the credits roll, and that’s the mark of true artistry.