The Hypocrisy of Selective Outrage: A Tale of Mina Smallman

The Hypocrisy of Selective Outrage: A Tale of Mina Smallman

This article critiques the media's selective outrage and hypocrisy in covering the tragic murders of Mina Smallman's daughters, highlighting racial and gender biases in news reporting.

Vince Vanguard

Vince Vanguard

The Hypocrisy of Selective Outrage: A Tale of Mina Smallman

In the world of modern media, where outrage is currency, the tragic story of Mina Smallman and her daughters, Bibaa Henry and Nicole Smallman, serves as a glaring example of selective attention. In June 2020, in a park in Wembley, London, the two sisters were brutally murdered. The case was shocking, yet it didn't receive the same level of media frenzy as other high-profile cases. Why? Because it didn't fit the narrative that the mainstream media and their liberal allies love to push. The victims were women of color, and the perpetrators were not the usual suspects that fit the media's preferred storyline.

Let's talk about the media's selective outrage. When a story fits their agenda, they are all over it like bees to honey. But when it doesn't, they conveniently look the other way. The tragic case of Mina Smallman's daughters is a prime example. The media was slow to pick up the story, and when they did, it was with a whisper rather than a roar. Why? Because it didn't fit the narrative of racial injustice that they love to exploit. The media loves to play the race card, but only when it suits them.

The police response to the murders was another point of contention. It was slow and inadequate, to say the least. But where was the outrage? Where were the protests and the calls for reform? The silence was deafening. If the victims had been of a different race, you can bet there would have been wall-to-wall coverage and demands for justice. But because they were women of color, the response was muted. It's a sad reality that the media and their liberal allies only care about racial injustice when it fits their narrative.

The hypocrisy doesn't stop there. The media loves to champion women's rights, but only when it suits them. When women of color are the victims, their voices are often ignored. The case of Mina Smallman's daughters is a perfect example. The media was quick to jump on the bandwagon when it came to other high-profile cases involving women, but when it came to Bibaa and Nicole, they were nowhere to be found. It's a double standard that is all too common in today's media landscape.

The media's selective outrage is not just limited to race and gender. It's also about who the perpetrators are. If the perpetrators fit the media's preferred narrative, they are quick to condemn them. But if they don't, they are often given a pass. In the case of Mina Smallman's daughters, the perpetrators were not the usual suspects that the media loves to vilify. As a result, the story was not given the attention it deserved. It's a sad reality that the media is more interested in pushing their agenda than in seeking justice for all victims.

The case of Mina Smallman's daughters is a tragic reminder of the media's hypocrisy. It's a reminder that the media is more interested in pushing their agenda than in seeking justice for all victims. It's a reminder that the media's selective outrage is not just limited to race and gender, but also to who the perpetrators are. It's a reminder that the media is more interested in pushing their agenda than in seeking justice for all victims.

In a world where the media is supposed to be the watchdog, holding those in power accountable, it's a sad reality that they are often more interested in pushing their agenda than in seeking justice for all victims. The case of Mina Smallman's daughters is a tragic reminder of this reality. It's a reminder that the media's selective outrage is not just limited to race and gender, but also to who the perpetrators are. It's a reminder that the media is more interested in pushing their agenda than in seeking justice for all victims.