10 Reasons "Low Blow" is the Action Flick Liberals Love to Hate

10 Reasons "Low Blow" is the Action Flick Liberals Love to Hate

Dive into the controversial 1986 action film 'Low Blow' and understand why its unapologetic 80s style and politically incorrect themes make it a polarizing favorite among action movie enthusiasts.

Vince Vanguard

Vince Vanguard

10 Reasons "Low Blow" is the Action Flick Liberals Love to Hate

"Low Blow" is the 1986 action film that packs a punch, and not just in the literal sense. Directed by Frank Harris and starring Leo Fong, this movie is set in the gritty streets of San Francisco, where private investigator Joe Wong takes on a dangerous cult to rescue a wealthy man's daughter. Released during the Reagan era, "Low Blow" is a cinematic time capsule that embodies the unapologetic, no-nonsense attitude of the 1980s. It's a film that doesn't shy away from its politically incorrect roots, and that's precisely why it ruffles feathers among the more progressive crowd.

First off, let's talk about the protagonist, Joe Wong. He's the kind of hero who doesn't wait for permission or follow the rules. In today's world, where every action is scrutinized and debated, Joe's shoot-first-ask-questions-later approach is a refreshing throwback to a time when heroes were allowed to be flawed and human. Liberals might argue that his methods are reckless, but that's what makes him so compelling. He's a man of action, not words, and that's a quality sorely lacking in today's overly cautious society.

The film's portrayal of villains is another sticking point. The cult in "Low Blow" is depicted as a bizarre, almost cartoonish group of misfits led by a charismatic leader. It's a clear nod to the real-world fears of the time, when cults were a genuine concern. But in today's climate, where every group demands respect and understanding, this portrayal is seen as insensitive. The film doesn't waste time on moral relativism; it paints the bad guys as bad, period. And that's a narrative choice that doesn't sit well with those who prefer shades of gray.

"Low Blow" also doesn't shy away from its low-budget roots. The film's gritty aesthetic and practical effects are a far cry from the CGI-laden blockbusters of today. It's a reminder of a time when filmmakers had to get creative with their resources, and that creativity often led to more authentic storytelling. But in an era where production value is often equated with quality, this rawness is seen as a flaw rather than a feature.

The film's treatment of gender roles is another point of contention. The female characters in "Low Blow" are often relegated to damsels in distress or background players. In a world where gender equality is a hot-button issue, this aspect of the film is seen as outdated and problematic. But let's be honest, not every film needs to be a social commentary. Sometimes, a movie is just a movie, and "Low Blow" is unapologetically a product of its time.

Then there's the issue of violence. "Low Blow" is an action film, and it doesn't hold back on the punches, kicks, and gunfights. In a society increasingly concerned with the impact of media violence, this film's unabashed embrace of action is seen as irresponsible. But for those who grew up on a steady diet of action flicks, it's a nostalgic reminder of a time when movies were allowed to be fun without a moral lesson tacked on.

The film's dialogue is another area where it diverges from modern sensibilities. It's filled with one-liners and tough-guy talk that would make any screenwriting professor cringe. But that's part of its charm. It's a film that doesn't take itself too seriously, and in a world where every word is dissected for hidden meanings, that's a breath of fresh air.

"Low Blow" also challenges the notion of what makes a hero. Joe Wong isn't a polished, perfect protagonist. He's rough around the edges, makes mistakes, and doesn't always play by the rules. But that's what makes him relatable. In a world where heroes are often portrayed as infallible, Joe's imperfections are a reminder that real heroes are human.

The film's pacing is another aspect that sets it apart. It's a fast-paced, no-frills action movie that doesn't waste time on unnecessary exposition. In an age where films are often criticized for being too long or too slow, "Low Blow" is a masterclass in efficient storytelling.

Finally, "Low Blow" is a film that knows exactly what it is and doesn't apologize for it. It's a straightforward action movie that delivers on its promises. In a world where films are often bogged down by their own ambitions, "Low Blow" is a reminder that sometimes, simplicity is key.

In the end, "Low Blow" is a film that doesn't care about political correctness or modern sensibilities. It's a product of its time, and that's precisely why it continues to resonate with those who appreciate its unapologetic approach to storytelling. So, if you're looking for a film that doesn't pull its punches, "Low Blow" is the action flick for you.