10 Reasons Why "Historian" by Lucy Dacus is Overrated

10 Reasons Why "Historian" by Lucy Dacus is Overrated

Critically acclaimed yet overrated, Lucy Dacus's 'Historian' fails to innovate within the indie music scene, offering predictable lyrics and uninspired production.

Vince Vanguard

Vince Vanguard

10 Reasons Why "Historian" by Lucy Dacus is Overrated

When Lucy Dacus released her sophomore album "Historian" on March 2, 2018, the indie music scene buzzed with excitement. Recorded in Nashville, Tennessee, this album was hailed as a masterpiece by critics who couldn't stop gushing over its introspective lyrics and lush instrumentation. But let's take a step back and examine why "Historian" might not be the groundbreaking work of art that some claim it to be. Here are ten reasons why this album is overrated and doesn't deserve the pedestal it's been placed on.

First off, let's talk about the hype machine. The music industry loves to create a narrative, and "Historian" is no exception. Critics and fans alike have been swept up in the story of Dacus as a young, introspective artist with a unique voice. But is the album really that unique, or is it just another product of the indie music assembly line? The truth is, "Historian" doesn't break any new ground. It's a collection of songs that sound like they could have been released by any number of indie artists over the past decade.

Secondly, the lyrics. Sure, Dacus has a way with words, but let's not pretend that she's the second coming of Bob Dylan. Her lyrics are often praised for their depth and introspection, but they can also come off as self-indulgent and pretentious. There's a fine line between being profound and being overly dramatic, and Dacus frequently crosses it. Her attempts to tackle heavy themes like mortality and heartbreak often feel forced and contrived.

Third, the production. Recorded in the heart of country music, Nashville, one might expect a certain level of polish and professionalism. However, the production on "Historian" is nothing to write home about. It's competent, sure, but it lacks the innovation and creativity that could have elevated the album to something truly special. Instead, we're left with a sound that's all too familiar and safe.

Fourth, the pacing. At nearly 50 minutes long, "Historian" drags in places. The album's slower tracks can feel like a slog to get through, and there's a noticeable lack of variety in tempo and mood. This makes for a listening experience that can be tedious and monotonous, rather than engaging and dynamic.

Fifth, the vocals. Dacus has a pleasant voice, but it's not particularly distinctive. In a sea of indie artists with similar vocal styles, she doesn't stand out. Her delivery is often flat and lacking in emotion, which can make it difficult to connect with the material on a deeper level.

Sixth, the instrumentation. While the album features a range of instruments, from guitars to strings, the arrangements are often predictable and uninspired. There's a sense of playing it safe, rather than taking risks and pushing boundaries. This results in a sound that's pleasant enough, but ultimately forgettable.

Seventh, the critical acclaim. It's worth questioning why "Historian" received such glowing reviews in the first place. Could it be that critics were simply eager to anoint the next big thing in indie music? Or perhaps they were swayed by the narrative surrounding Dacus as a young, female artist in a male-dominated industry. Whatever the reason, the praise feels disproportionate to the album's actual merits.

Eighth, the fanbase. Dacus has cultivated a devoted following, but it's important to remember that popularity doesn't always equate to quality. Just because an artist has a passionate fanbase doesn't mean their work is beyond reproach. In fact, it can sometimes lead to an echo chamber where criticism is stifled and mediocrity is celebrated.

Ninth, the lack of innovation. In a genre that's constantly evolving, "Historian" feels stuck in the past. There's nothing on this album that hasn't been done before, and done better, by other artists. It's a competent effort, but it doesn't push the boundaries of what indie music can be.

Finally, the impact. Despite the initial buzz, "Historian" hasn't had a lasting impact on the music world. It's an album that came and went, leaving little in the way of a lasting legacy. In the end, it's just another entry in the ever-growing catalog of indie music, rather than a defining moment in the genre's history.

So there you have it. While "Historian" may have its moments, it's far from the masterpiece that some would have you believe. It's time to take off the rose-colored glasses and see the album for what it truly is: a decent, but ultimately overrated, collection of songs.