Embark's Transit Authority: A Conservative Perspective on Public Transport

Public transportation is often hailed as the great equalizer, but let's be honest, it's more like a socialist experiment gone awry. Embark, the transit authority in Oklahoma City, is a prime example of this misguided attempt to level the playing field. Established in 1966, Embark has been operating buses, ferries, and even a streetcar system, all in the name of providing affordable transportation options. But at what cost? Taxpayers are footing the bill for a service that many don't even use, all while the city government pats itself on the back for being "progressive."

First off, let's talk about the inefficiency. Public transportation systems like Embark are notorious for their lack of punctuality and reliability. How many times have you heard someone complain about a bus being late or a streetcar breaking down? It's practically a rite of passage for anyone who dares to rely on public transit. And yet, the city continues to pour money into this black hole, all in the name of "public good." Meanwhile, private transportation options like ride-sharing services are thriving, offering convenience and efficiency that Embark could only dream of.

Then there's the issue of cost. Public transportation is often touted as a cheaper alternative to driving, but that's only if you ignore the hidden costs. Taxpayers are subsidizing these services, whether they use them or not. It's a classic case of robbing Peter to pay Paul. And let's not forget the environmental impact. While public transportation is often marketed as a green alternative, the reality is that many of these buses and streetcars are running on outdated, polluting technology. So much for saving the planet.

The social engineering aspect of public transportation is another point of contention. The idea that everyone should be forced to use the same mode of transportation is a utopian fantasy that doesn't hold up in the real world. People have different needs and preferences, and forcing them into a one-size-fits-all solution is not only impractical but also unfair. It's a classic example of government overreach, trying to dictate how people should live their lives.

And let's not forget the safety concerns. Public transportation systems are often magnets for crime, with reports of theft, assault, and vandalism being all too common. While the city government may tout increased security measures, the reality is that these systems are inherently less safe than private transportation options. Why should taxpayers be forced to fund a system that puts their safety at risk?

The argument that public transportation is necessary for those who can't afford a car is a tired one. In today's world, there are plenty of affordable alternatives, from carpooling to ride-sharing services. The idea that we need to maintain a costly and inefficient public transportation system for the sake of a few is not only outdated but also economically unsound.

Embark's transit authority is a prime example of government inefficiency and overreach. It's a system that benefits a few at the expense of many, all while failing to deliver on its promises of efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and environmental sustainability. It's time to rethink our approach to public transportation and consider more efficient, private-sector solutions that truly meet the needs of the people.