Brent R. Appel: The Judge Who Stood for Common Sense

In a world where common sense often seems to be in short supply, Brent R. Appel, a former justice of the Iowa Supreme Court, has been a beacon of rationality and reason. Appel, who served on the court from 2006 until his retirement in 2022, made headlines for his unwavering commitment to the rule of law and his refusal to bow to the whims of political correctness. During his tenure, Appel was known for his sharp legal mind and his ability to cut through the noise to get to the heart of the matter. His decisions often reflected a deep understanding of the Constitution and a respect for the principles upon which this great nation was founded.

Appel's tenure on the Iowa Supreme Court was marked by a series of decisions that left the progressive left clutching their pearls. He was not afraid to challenge the status quo and question the overreach of government power. In a time when many judges seem more interested in legislating from the bench than interpreting the law, Appel stood out as a jurist who understood the importance of judicial restraint. His rulings often emphasized the need for a limited government and the protection of individual liberties, much to the chagrin of those who believe in an ever-expanding state.

One of Appel's most notable cases involved the defense of free speech, a fundamental right that is increasingly under attack. In a landmark decision, he sided with the First Amendment, affirming that even speech that some might find offensive is protected under the Constitution. This decision was a slap in the face to those who would prefer to silence dissenting voices in the name of political correctness. Appel understood that the right to free speech is the cornerstone of a free society, and he was not afraid to defend it, even when it was unpopular to do so.

Another area where Appel made his mark was in the realm of property rights. He consistently ruled in favor of individuals and businesses against government encroachment. In a world where eminent domain is often abused to benefit special interests, Appel's decisions were a breath of fresh air. He recognized that property rights are essential to personal freedom and economic prosperity, and he was not willing to let the government trample on those rights without a fight.

Appel's commitment to the rule of law extended to his views on criminal justice. He was a strong advocate for the rights of the accused, ensuring that due process was upheld and that the government was held accountable for its actions. At the same time, he was not soft on crime. He understood the importance of maintaining law and order and was not afraid to hand down tough sentences when warranted. His balanced approach to criminal justice was a testament to his belief in fairness and justice for all.

Despite his many accomplishments, Appel's tenure was not without controversy. His decisions often drew the ire of those who believe that the judiciary should be a tool for social change rather than a guardian of the Constitution. But Appel was not swayed by the court of public opinion. He remained steadfast in his commitment to the principles of justice and the rule of law, even when it meant standing alone.

Brent R. Appel's legacy is one of courage, integrity, and an unwavering commitment to the principles that make America great. In an era where many judges are more concerned with being politically correct than upholding the law, Appel was a refreshing reminder of what it means to be a true jurist. His decisions will continue to resonate for years to come, serving as a reminder that common sense and the rule of law are not relics of the past, but essential components of a free and just society.