UCLA Student Government: A Conservative Perspective on Activism Gone Awry

UCLA Student Government: A Conservative Perspective on Activism Gone Awry

UCLA's student government isn't about advocacy; it's a grand stage for activist theatrics that leave conservative and moderate voices sidelined. The ASUCLA operates under the guise of student representation, yet focuses more on group identities and social justice than tangible student benefits.

Vince Vanguard

Vince Vanguard

Whispers around the quad often say that the Associated Students of the University of California, Los Angeles (ASUCLA), has about as much going on behind the scenes as the plot twists in a binge-worthy drama series. The ASUCLA is the governing student body representing the thousands of voices on campus. Founded in 1919, located in the bustling and diverse city of Los Angeles, this organization claims to advocate for all students. But here's the kicker: an agenda colored in one shade - that is, if blue were a color for activism.

  1. Identity Soup Politics: Forget the student, it’s all about group identity. If you believe in individual responsibility rather than identifying with a specific group to demand government action, you'll find this student government a tidal wave of frustration.

  2. The Spending Spree: Ah, the lavish lifestyle without the dividends. The ASUCLA manages millions in student fees and funds, yet students often wonder why improvements across campus remain as scarce as a snowball in the desert. Accountability? More like a luxury item.

  3. Bureaucratic Overreach: Ever heard of the phrase “too many cooks in the kitchen”? ASUCLA has more committees and subcommittees than you can shake a stick at. And what do they produce? Red tape and endless debate over climate change policies rather than focusing on student life enhancement.

  4. The Pledge to Equality: Equality is fantastic. Equality of outcome? Not so much. This place seems bent on promoting quotas over character, teaching students that checking the right box gets you further than hard work.

  5. Speech and Sensibility: Under the guise of promoting inclusivity, they impose restrictions on free speech. Safe spaces? They’re more like censorship spaces. A speaker list vetted like a nuclear launch protocol ensures contrarians are kept out.

  6. Election Fever: Elections at ASUCLA are more about popularity contests than actual policy debates. Campaigning is all about who can promise more freebies rather than who can deliver more dignity to the student experience.

  7. Sustainability Circus: Sustainability is noble, but when the focus shifts from practical solutions to symbolic gestures, you get a student government that's essentially a social media influencer, all photo ops and no action.

  8. The Social Justice Train: If it runs but doesn't burn fossil fuels, count ASUCLA in. Their social justice campaigns have more buzz than a beehive but yield results as vague as the ending of a French film.

  9. Lopsided Advocacy: You won’t be hard-pressed to see where their sympathies lie—it's usually with whatever social movement is trending on Twitter. Do they represent all students? Only if you tow the party line.

  10. Lost in Translation: Wandering through their rhetoric takes a decoder ring. It’s as far left as a driver in the fast lane. Conservative or moderate students might feel like tourists in their own campus, wondering where their tuition dollars are really heading.

The ASUCLA’s vision of an ideal university society seems to be one big re-education camp, where everyone marches to the same ideological rhythm. Diversity of thought? Take a back seat, there’s a new echo chamber in town. Between their thirst for activism and love for labels, the Associated Students of UCLA continues to paint a curious picture of modern student governance, one that leaves some students asking, “Are they for us, or for themselves?”