10 Reasons Why Argumentation Theory is a Liberal Tool to Control Free Speech
Argumentation theory, a concept that has been around since the days of Aristotle, is being wielded by the left as a weapon to stifle free speech and control the narrative. This theory, which focuses on the study of how conclusions are reached through logical reasoning, is being manipulated by liberals to silence conservative voices. It's happening right now, in universities and media outlets across the country, and it's time to call it out for what it is: a tool for censorship.
The Illusion of Rational Debate: Argumentation theory is supposed to promote rational debate, but in reality, it's being used to create an illusion of fairness. The left claims to value open discussion, but they only want to hear arguments that align with their own beliefs. Anything else is dismissed as irrational or uninformed.
Weaponizing Logic: Liberals have turned logic into a weapon, using it to attack and belittle those who disagree with them. They hide behind complex arguments and jargon, making it difficult for the average person to engage in the conversation. This elitist approach is designed to exclude and silence dissenting voices.
The Fallacy of Objectivity: Argumentation theory claims to be objective, but it's often used to push a subjective agenda. The left cherry-picks evidence and constructs arguments that support their worldview, while ignoring or dismissing any evidence to the contrary. This selective use of logic is anything but objective.
Silencing Dissent: By controlling the terms of the debate, the left effectively silences dissent. They set the rules for what constitutes a valid argument, and anything that falls outside of those rules is deemed unacceptable. This is not about fostering open dialogue; it's about shutting down opposing viewpoints.
The Tyranny of Consensus: Argumentation theory is often used to promote the idea of consensus, but this is just another way to suppress individual thought. The left uses the guise of consensus to pressure individuals into conforming to their views, stifling creativity and independent thinking.
The Myth of Neutrality: The left claims that argumentation theory is a neutral tool, but this is a myth. In practice, it's used to advance a specific political agenda. By framing their arguments as neutral and logical, they attempt to delegitimize any opposition as biased or irrational.
The Cult of Expertise: Argumentation theory elevates so-called experts, giving them undue influence over public discourse. The left uses these experts to validate their arguments, while dismissing the opinions of ordinary people. This creates a hierarchy of voices, where only the "qualified" are allowed to speak.
The Erosion of Common Sense: In their quest to dominate the conversation, the left has abandoned common sense. They rely on convoluted arguments and abstract theories that have little relevance to everyday life. This disconnect from reality alienates people and undermines the credibility of their arguments.
The Distraction Tactic: Argumentation theory is often used as a distraction tactic, diverting attention away from the real issues. The left focuses on winning arguments rather than solving problems, using debate as a way to avoid taking meaningful action.
The Death of Free Speech: Ultimately, the misuse of argumentation theory is a threat to free speech. By controlling the narrative and silencing dissent, the left is eroding the very foundation of democratic society. It's time to reclaim the conversation and ensure that all voices are heard.
Argumentation theory, in its current form, is being used as a tool of control rather than a means of fostering genuine dialogue. It's time to recognize this manipulation for what it is and push back against the left's attempts to dominate the conversation. Free speech is too important to be left in the hands of those who seek to silence opposition.