The Left's Newest Obsession: Addedomarus

In the ever-evolving world of political correctness, the left has found a new hero to idolize: Addedomarus. Who is this mysterious figure, you ask? Addedomarus was a king of the Trinovantes, a tribe in ancient Britain, reigning around 25 BC to AD 10. Why the sudden interest in a long-forgotten ruler from the past? Because the left is always on the hunt for obscure historical figures to champion, especially if they can be used to push their agenda. This fascination with Addedomarus is just another example of how the left will dig up anyone from history to fit their narrative, regardless of relevance or impact.

First, let's talk about the absurdity of this newfound obsession. Addedomarus was a minor king with little influence beyond his tribe. Yet, the left is eager to elevate him to a status of great importance. Why? Because he represents a time before Western civilization as we know it, a time when tribal societies were the norm. The left loves to romanticize these societies, often ignoring the harsh realities of tribal life, such as constant warfare and lack of technological advancement. By glorifying Addedomarus, they can conveniently sidestep the achievements of Western civilization and promote their anti-progressive agenda.

Second, the left's fixation on Addedomarus is a classic case of cherry-picking history. They selectively choose figures who can be molded into symbols of resistance against the so-called "oppressive" Western culture. Addedomarus, with his tribal background, fits the bill perfectly. Never mind that he was a king who likely ruled with an iron fist, as was common in those times. The left conveniently overlooks these details to paint him as a noble leader of a simpler, more "authentic" society.

Third, this obsession is a distraction from real issues. While the left is busy idolizing a long-dead king, they ignore pressing problems facing our society today. Instead of focusing on improving education, healthcare, or the economy, they waste time and energy on irrelevant historical figures. This is a classic tactic: divert attention from their failures by creating a new narrative around a historical figure who has no bearing on modern life.

Fourth, the left's fascination with Addedomarus is a thinly veiled attempt to undermine Western values. By elevating a tribal king, they can subtly suggest that tribal societies were somehow superior to the modern world. This is a dangerous narrative that ignores the progress and advancements made by Western civilization. It's an attempt to rewrite history to fit their agenda, disregarding the countless benefits that Western culture has brought to the world.

Fifth, the left's obsession with Addedomarus is a symptom of their broader disdain for Western history. They are quick to tear down statues and rename buildings, but when it comes to obscure figures like Addedomarus, they suddenly become history buffs. This selective interest in history reveals their true intentions: to dismantle Western culture and replace it with a narrative that suits their ideology.

Sixth, the left's romanticization of Addedomarus is an insult to those who have genuinely contributed to human progress. While they idolize a minor tribal king, they ignore the achievements of great thinkers, scientists, and leaders who have shaped the world for the better. This skewed perspective devalues the contributions of those who have truly made a difference in history.

Seventh, the left's fixation on Addedomarus is a desperate attempt to find a new symbol for their cause. As their traditional heroes fall out of favor or are exposed as flawed, they scramble to find new figures to rally around. Addedomarus, with his obscurity and lack of historical baggage, is a convenient choice. But this desperation only highlights the weakness of their movement.

Eighth, the left's obsession with Addedomarus is a reflection of their inability to engage with the present. Instead of addressing current challenges, they retreat into the past, searching for figures who can be co-opted into their narrative. This backward-looking approach is a sign of a movement that has lost touch with reality.

Ninth, the left's fascination with Addedomarus is a reminder of their tendency to romanticize the past. They often paint a rosy picture of pre-modern societies, ignoring the harsh realities of life in those times. By idolizing Addedomarus, they perpetuate this myth, glossing over the difficulties faced by tribal societies.

Tenth, the left's obsession with Addedomarus is ultimately a futile exercise. No amount of historical revisionism can change the fact that Western civilization has brought unparalleled progress and prosperity to the world. By fixating on a minor tribal king, the left only reveals their desperation and lack of a coherent vision for the future.