The 2017 NDP Leadership Election: A Circus Under the Big Tent

The 2017 NDP Leadership Election: A Circus Under the Big Tent

The 2017 NDP leadership election was a political spectacle, a circus-like event within Canadian politics as the party struggled to redefine its direction and leadership.

Vince Vanguard

Vince Vanguard

Who doesn’t love a good political circus, especially when it's under the big left-leaning tent of the New Democratic Party? In 2017, the New Democratic Party (NDP) of Canada held a leadership election that became a spectacle to remember. This race, taking place in the vibrant corridors of Canadian politics, sought to replace outgoing leader Thomas Mulcair after the party's disappointing third-place finish in the 2015 federal election. It wasn't just about electing a new head of the party; it was about redefining the direction amid political chaos and ideological identity crises.

Let’s dive into the rollercoaster of events that was the 2017 NDP leadership election—less a strategic play of chess and more a chaotic game of Twister, if you ask me. The candidates: Jagmeet Singh, Guy Caron, Charlie Angus, and Niki Ashton. Each one attempted to out-left the others in a race to convince party members who was the most ideologically pure. What could be better for conservatives than watching from the sidelines with a bucket of popcorn?

First, we have Jagmeet Singh, the eventual victor and darling of progressive politics. He campaigned on a platform filled with buzzwords and promises: economic equality, environmental justice, and affordable housing for all. Singh, with his telegenic presence and charismatic speeches, managed to capture the imagination of party members, especially those looking at identity diversity over plain political competency. But behind the curtain of photogenic smiles, did the policies hold enough water to stay politically afloat? Singh's critics argue his proposals lacked the details and fiscal responsibility needed in a country that doesn't print monopoly money.

Ah, Guy Caron, the self-proclaimed intellectual. He sees economic sustainability where others see economic disaster. Caron attempted to woo voters with promises of a guaranteed basic income, arguing it was the answer to all of Canada’s problems, from poverty to economic disparity. Yet, critics saw his approach as a simplistic, idealistic dream with enormous costs and little to no clear path on funding it. Who doesn’t love magical thinking in politics?

Charlie Angus, with his authentic ‘man of the people’ approach, positioned himself as the working-class hero. His earnest discussions on issues like indigenous rights and the opioid crisis struck a chord with certain demographics, but even his best ideas couldn’t shake the perception that his candidacy was more the 'same old, same old' with a somewhat sincere twist. While Angus' heart may have been in the right place, the playbook seemed all too familiar without substantial new content.

Then there was Niki Ashton, the young and fierce advocate for social justice. Ashton aimed to harness the energy of youth activism, running campaigns emphasizing feminism, universal pharmacare, and tuition-free post-secondary education. While these are catchy on a protest sign, the complexities and expenses of implementing such policies were largely left unaddressed. Critics saw her as being overly idealistic, rallying a youthful cohort that might not yet have grappled with political realism.

So, why does it matter? Because despite being a sideshow to the main event, the 2017 leadership race defined the NDP's transition into a more woke-oriented party line. Many argue that in trying to out-left each other, the candidates risked detaching themselves from mainstream Canadian concerns, thereby alienating moderate voters. And as a conservative watching on, it’s hard not to marvel at a party trying to appeal to the masses after emerging from such an internal fray.

Jagmeet Singh eventually won with a decisive first-ballot victory, giving the NDP its first visible minority leader, a historical feat considering the party's orientation. But history didn't stop there; Singh's leadership would become a litmus test for matching party rhetoric with tangible policy outcomes. With an ambition to lead the NDP back to electoral relevancy, Singh’s leadership would face scrutiny over whether it would revive or further sideline the party on the national political stage.

In the broader scheme of Canadian politics, 2017 was a year illustrating the complexities the NDP faced to remain relevant against juggernaut opponents like Justin Trudeau's Liberals or Andrew Scheer’s Conservatives. Whether it was a triumph or tragedy for the NDP depends on your vantage point. For those of us on the right side of the spectrum, it was a fascinating exercise in watching left-leaning policies clash with political reality. After all, nothing quite entertains like watching the opposition's wrestling match with their ideological soul.